🔗 Share this article

Through a unsigned order, the nation's top court permitted Texas to employ a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that may create several five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three decision, released on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's ruling that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The federal judge erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disturbing the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the order stated in detailing its action.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters according to their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to use the boundaries established after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Stinging Opposition

Through a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She stated that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was actually authored by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan argued in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

The court's action is part of a countrywide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican hold. Ordinarily, map-drawing occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that could add several more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have countered with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas attorney general hailed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures representation supportive of the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic leaders lamented the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

Another top Democratic figure stated the court had once again eroded its legitimacy by approving a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.